![]() |
||
| Strona główna Dom Kariera Rodzina Styl Zdrowie Związki Życie Klub | ||
|
|||
|
|||||||
| Zarejestruj się | FAQ | Blogi | Galerie | Użytkownicy | Kalendarz | Szukaj | Dzisiejsze Posty | Oznacz Fora Jako Przeczytane |
![]() |
|
|
Narzędzia wątku | Przeszukaj ten wątek | Wygląd |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
My team is currently struggling with a massive legacy monolith that has become a nightmare to maintain. Every small update seems to break something unrelated, and our deployment cycles are getting longer and longer. We are considering migrating to a microservices architecture using Docker and Kubernetes, but I’m worried about the added complexity. Is the overhead of managing service-to-service communication worth the scalability benefits?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The "distributed monolith" trap is real, so be careful! Microservices solve scaling issues but introduce massive networking and observability challenges. Before you split everything, ensure your team has solid DevOps foundations. When we did our migration last year, the initial configuration of the API Gateway and service mesh was incredibly stressful. During the long CI/CD pipeline runs and container builds, I often took short mental breaks on https://basswinn.net/ to clear my head before diving back into the YAML files. It really helped me stay focused during the troubleshooting phase. My advice: start by extracting just one non-critical service first. If you canât manage one independent service, you definitely aren't ready to manage fifty!
|